Discuss Detroit » Archives - July 2007 » People Mover: 'A Rich Folks' Roller Coaster' » Archive through August 17, 2007 « Previous Next »
Top of pageBottom of page

Kslice
Member
Username: Kslice

Post Number: 141
Registered: 04-2007
Posted on Friday, August 17, 2007 - 10:29 am:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Taking the Pm down now would just be stupid. We've spent all that money on it and cant very well just give it up. Whats worse than an almost useless train? Tearing down the almost useless train track instead of making it use full.

If the PM goes down everyone out side the city will say, Oh typical Detroit, doesn't have the brains or money to make anything work. If the PM got extended or more light rail added to the point where people wanted to ride it it would be a great victory for the city.

It's either admit defeat when your behind or try a new game plan to get ahead.
Top of pageBottom of page

Jt1
Member
Username: Jt1

Post Number: 9842
Registered: 10-2003
Posted on Friday, August 17, 2007 - 10:32 am:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

quote:

Hey Jt1, there is no such thing as "The Suburbs" as though they are a single entity that circle there SUVs against the uncivilized.

Pleeeeze, the notion that Eastpointe, Redford, Ferndale, Taylor, Melvindale and Birmingham join in a single conspiracy is unbelievable. Laughable.



OK, I will amend it. Some of the suburbs fought it. I assumed that it didn't need to be quantified at that level. The feds pulled the money for regional mass transit becuase the region, as a whole would not approve it because some of the suburbs refused to support the plan.

Does that make you a little happier?
Top of pageBottom of page

Iheartthed
Member
Username: Iheartthed

Post Number: 1388
Registered: 04-2006
Posted on Friday, August 17, 2007 - 10:40 am:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Uh, yeah... but no. The reason the DPM is so monetarily inefficient is because it's so damn physically limited.

It's really unfair to compare it to NYCTA or even the Detroit buses. You cannot even transfer efficiently from a DDOT bus onto the DPM. Thus there is no incentive for anyone to use it beyond a novelty. It might as well be the monorail at Disney World in it's current state. If it were tied into a larger transit system that served a larger segment of people then it's operating cost per passenger would probably reduce dramatically.
Top of pageBottom of page

Higgs1634
Member
Username: Higgs1634

Post Number: 154
Registered: 10-2005
Posted on Friday, August 17, 2007 - 10:46 am:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

My personal favorite PM stops are the "Bricktown" and "Greektown" stations. Those stops are less than a block apart.
Top of pageBottom of page

French777
Member
Username: French777

Post Number: 199
Registered: 10-2006
Posted on Friday, August 17, 2007 - 10:49 am:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

I wish Metro Detroit and Downtown had something like the D.C metro system!
Top of pageBottom of page

Irish_mafia
Member
Username: Irish_mafia

Post Number: 995
Registered: 10-2003
Posted on Friday, August 17, 2007 - 10:50 am:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

So to Mackinaw's point, why not a street car down the middle of Woodward from Grand Circus right next to the people mover station to New Center... to start....and eventually to Ferndale and Royal Oak.

Make it an express... 1 stop at the DPL, return at Grand Blvd.

Simple connection between focused target areas that adds value to the roller coaster.

How much would that cost?
Top of pageBottom of page

Jt1
Member
Username: Jt1

Post Number: 9843
Registered: 10-2003
Posted on Friday, August 17, 2007 - 10:55 am:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

quote:

So to Mackinaw's point, why not a street car down the middle of Woodward from Grand Circus right next to the people mover station to New Center... to start....and eventually to Ferndale and Royal Oak.

Make it an express... 1 stop at the DPL, return at Grand Blvd.

Simple connection between focused target areas that adds value to the roller coaster.

How much would that cost?



Sounds like a good idea that culd be implemented pretty quickly with a reasonable cost.
Top of pageBottom of page

Johnlodge
Member
Username: Johnlodge

Post Number: 1867
Registered: 10-2003
Posted on Friday, August 17, 2007 - 10:56 am:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Perhaps this handy guide will help.



Top of pageBottom of page

Rjk
Member
Username: Rjk

Post Number: 806
Registered: 11-2003
Posted on Friday, August 17, 2007 - 10:57 am:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Is there technology (Motion sensors) that would allow the PM to skip stops where people are not present? The amount of time it stops to pick up no one can get a little ridiculous.
Top of pageBottom of page

Oakmangirl
Member
Username: Oakmangirl

Post Number: 68
Registered: 08-2007
Posted on Friday, August 17, 2007 - 10:57 am:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Apparently, too much. It's easier to subsidize more parking structures.
Top of pageBottom of page

Thejesus
Member
Username: Thejesus

Post Number: 1858
Registered: 06-2006
Posted on Friday, August 17, 2007 - 11:03 am:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

"If the People Mover is mostly used by suburbanites, then shouldn't the entire region help pay for the subsidization?"

The suburbs do help pay for it...in the form of 50 cent fares every time they ride it...

Why in the world would the suburban governments agree to help fund the thing when an overwhelming majority of us out here (and I'm talking in the 90 -100% range) don't even use it and think it's too expensive and a horrible idea to begin with?
Top of pageBottom of page

Iheartthed
Member
Username: Iheartthed

Post Number: 1390
Registered: 04-2006
Posted on Friday, August 17, 2007 - 11:07 am:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Is there technology (Motion sensors) that would allow the PM to skip stops where people are not present? The amount of time it stops to pick up no one can get a little ridiculous.

Very bad idea. There might be someone who wants to get off at that station...

^cleaned it up before the dirty jokes came.

(Message edited by iheartthed on August 17, 2007)
Top of pageBottom of page

Gotdetroit
Member
Username: Gotdetroit

Post Number: 94
Registered: 12-2005
Posted on Friday, August 17, 2007 - 11:10 am:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

You know, seeing as this thing is run electronically, they could, perhaps/maybe/dunno, make the PM a two way system by building a couple of strategic runarounds. If you time the thing correctly, the trains heading in opposite directions would pass at the passing tracks and not kill everyone.

That's probably putting a lot of faith in Windows 95 tho.
Top of pageBottom of page

Johnlodge
Member
Username: Johnlodge

Post Number: 1869
Registered: 10-2003
Posted on Friday, August 17, 2007 - 11:17 am:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

"That's probably putting a lot of faith in Windows 95 tho."

I believe it runs in DOS 2.0.

C:\>cd peoplemover
C:\PEOPLEMOVER\>peoplemover.ex e

Usefullness cannot be found. (A)bort, (R)etry, (I)gnore?
Top of pageBottom of page

Dbest
Member
Username: Dbest

Post Number: 44
Registered: 03-2007
Posted on Friday, August 17, 2007 - 11:20 am:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

You guys crack me up, notice more than 60% of riders are not city residents which means for people out of town this is somewhat of an attraction for a city with limited attractions.

As for those of you who think they should have never built this give me a break! I make sure to ride it every time i make the trek from Indiana and my friends I brought to Detroit for the first time thought it was pretty neat. Granted not the model of efficiency but a fun ride. Look at it how you want I'll view it as a glass half full.

The people mover would be a huge hit in many other more vibrant downtowns, look at when it was built hardly the glory days of downtown, the best is yet to come, the superbowl was a great example with everyone saying how vibrant it was and the people riding the PM it goes to show the potential! Build back up the downtown and they will ride.
Top of pageBottom of page

Oakmangirl
Member
Username: Oakmangirl

Post Number: 70
Registered: 08-2007
Posted on Friday, August 17, 2007 - 11:20 am:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Why don't we just make it an Express loop and rename it "Bill Bonds's Wild Ride"...hold on to your hair!
Top of pageBottom of page

Sstashmoo
Member
Username: Sstashmoo

Post Number: 270
Registered: 02-2007
Posted on Friday, August 17, 2007 - 11:24 am:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

They should shut it down and make it a static display or only run it on the weekends. Until there is a base of necessary destinations, just park it. It's nonsense to keep running the thing when the city is in such bad financial shape. It has returned some investment in terms of visual effect for the city and tourism. It is impressive to see. It's still too early for it to be truly effective transportation.
Top of pageBottom of page

Iheartthed
Member
Username: Iheartthed

Post Number: 1391
Registered: 04-2006
Posted on Friday, August 17, 2007 - 11:26 am:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

I'd guess the reason it's such a "hit" among outsiders is because it's easier to direct someone to take the train x stops rather than explain hot to navigate the streets. The problem is that it wasn't built either solely or primarily for the novelty of outsiders.
Top of pageBottom of page

Screamingfit
Member
Username: Screamingfit

Post Number: 11
Registered: 03-2006
Posted on Friday, August 17, 2007 - 11:40 am:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

A light rail line right up Woodward from Detroit to Pontiac and from Detroit to Ann Arbor would be wonderful.

Unfortunately, it will never happen. And, even if it did, no one would use it. There's still no big draw downtown for most average people. Though a train will encourage growth, I think most wouldn't build a train until the growth was already there (chicken before the egg).

If you travel to Portland, Oregon, you will see public transportation done right (politics aside). This is what type of service you are provided by a liberal state government and a large eco-conscious constituency that demand such things.
Top of pageBottom of page

Iheartthed
Member
Username: Iheartthed

Post Number: 1392
Registered: 04-2006
Posted on Friday, August 17, 2007 - 11:41 am:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

^Thus Detroit will continue to die.
Top of pageBottom of page

Johnlodge
Member
Username: Johnlodge

Post Number: 1871
Registered: 10-2003
Posted on Friday, August 17, 2007 - 11:43 am:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Perhaps a large sign outside Comerica Park directing people to the closest station, and advertising some of the restaurants and other entertainment that can be enjoyed after a game would be beneficial. Not sure Illitch would be keen on people leaving Illitch Land though.
Top of pageBottom of page

Ray1936
Member
Username: Ray1936

Post Number: 1812
Registered: 01-2005
Posted on Friday, August 17, 2007 - 12:28 pm:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Detroit is not alone in such a curiosity. Las Vegas has a monorail system that opened two years ago after much hoop-la. It's been a bust. Besides having a lousy route on the backside of the east side of the strip, it's suffered breakdown after breakdown. Damn thing has turned into a local joke.

On the plus side, it was built with private funds (although given the right-of-way by the county), so as a taxpayer I'm not burdened with this white elephant. Yet.

Link at www.lvmonorail.com
Top of pageBottom of page

Professorscott
Member
Username: Professorscott

Post Number: 649
Registered: 12-2006
Posted on Friday, August 17, 2007 - 12:48 pm:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

The People Mover has little ridership because it's not functioning as part of the overall public transit system. That's a theory, but let's see if my fellow bloggers can back me up.

I am a frequent bus rider. I have a regional pass. I spend a good bit of time downtown. And I absolutely never use the People Mover.

All my fellow bus riders, check in: do you use the People Mover as part of a trip by transit? Bringing your Aunt Jane from Omaha downtown to see it doesn't count. That's just treating it as an amusement park ride.

Curious to see what results we get here. My guess is a very low percentage, near zero, are going to say they use it.
Top of pageBottom of page

Mackinaw
Member
Username: Mackinaw

Post Number: 3600
Registered: 02-2005
Posted on Friday, August 17, 2007 - 12:53 pm:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

You know what, I have to question what I and other have been saying. Let's say we do get some new rapid transit along major thoroughfares, and even comprehensive reasonable transit; how would that make the DPM more useful? It would be the same deal, except more people would take transit downtown than their cars. Once downtown, you'd have the choice of walking, or shaving off two minutes and taking the DPM. The system would be no more useful; the only truely useful moments for it would be the same as now: when downtown is at maximum event/parking demand and you park on one side of downtown and want to get to the other side. I think we need to stop rationalizing it by saying that regional transit will make it better. It will still be a small, closed system of one-way trains in a one square mile area.

Now, you could "un-close" the system, bring the tracks down to street level, and extend the loop up to New Center or beyond (I just don't want to see more elevated rail around the city-- plus doing this would really make it like a rollercoaster!)
Top of pageBottom of page

Johnlodge
Member
Username: Johnlodge

Post Number: 1877
Registered: 10-2003
Posted on Friday, August 17, 2007 - 12:58 pm:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Ray, I like that LV Monorail, since it allows me to get to the Hilton without taking a Cab. I always have to visit that wacky Star Trek bar when I'm there.
Top of pageBottom of page

Jt1
Member
Username: Jt1

Post Number: 9845
Registered: 10-2003
Posted on Friday, August 17, 2007 - 1:03 pm:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

IN the winters they should fill the track with water, freeze it and make it a loop for ice skating. Charge $6 a head. :-)
Top of pageBottom of page

Bob
Member
Username: Bob

Post Number: 1540
Registered: 11-2003
Posted on Friday, August 17, 2007 - 1:08 pm:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

You can complain about the DPM, but look at how development is done around it. The new YMCA was originally supposed to connect to it, but due to cost it is just next to it. GM rebuilt their station when they took down the berms. Compuware integrated and rarely used station in to their parking garage. The DPM is marketed to out of town conventions as an easy way to to get around to stuff downtown. I know last March when the American String Teachers Association had their national convention at the Ren Cen Marriott, they many of the attendees used the DPM to get to Greektown and over to Broadway to go to the Opera House and Small Plates/Detroit Beer Company. It is an easy way for out of town visitors to get around downtown. I know when I first started going to Chicago, I did not know my way around and took the El places, it was much easier to walk to, but the directions were easier to follow from the El stations until you knew your way around. With the addition of the Book Cadillac and the Fort Shelby bringing more small convention business to our city, the DPM will come into more use. Also isn't the new Rosa Parks Transit Center supposed to help connect the busses to the DPM?
Top of pageBottom of page

Johnlodge
Member
Username: Johnlodge

Post Number: 1878
Registered: 10-2003
Posted on Friday, August 17, 2007 - 1:12 pm:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)



Top of pageBottom of page

Mackinaw
Member
Username: Mackinaw

Post Number: 3602
Registered: 02-2005
Posted on Friday, August 17, 2007 - 1:17 pm:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

"You can complain about the DPM, but look at how development is done around it."

Yeah, because it haphazardly cuts through city blocks. The Statler site redevelopment will have to have a sizable setback on Washington and Park because of the tracks, likewise at the YMCA, and the back side of the Hudson block. This is bad news.

You reinforced the point that it's appealing for visitors, but it still doesn't help locals that much.

RenCen to Greektown should be easily walkable. The only reason to take DPM is if it's zero degrees outside, or because Jefferson is too intimidating to try to cross (which I certainly sympathize with).
Top of pageBottom of page

Johnlodge
Member
Username: Johnlodge

Post Number: 1880
Registered: 10-2003
Posted on Friday, August 17, 2007 - 1:18 pm:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Mack, walking from RenCen to Greektown at night right now is not a walk I enjoy. The area is unlit, undeveloped, and can be intimidating. With more infill of development, then I would agree with you.