Discuss Detroit » Archives - July 2007 » Taping conversations as surveillance « Previous Next »
Top of pageBottom of page

Lilpup
Member
Username: Lilpup

Post Number: 3148
Registered: 06-2004
Posted on Wednesday, November 21, 2007 - 1:24 pm:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Is it illegal in Michigan, without a warrant, to tape conversations without the participants knowledge? I mean as if a surveillance camera was miced. I've read this varies from state to state.
Top of pageBottom of page

Rax
Member
Username: Rax

Post Number: 5
Registered: 11-2007
Posted on Wednesday, November 21, 2007 - 1:30 pm:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Well done.
Top of pageBottom of page

Spiritofdetroit
Member
Username: Spiritofdetroit

Post Number: 733
Registered: 11-2006
Posted on Wednesday, November 21, 2007 - 1:35 pm:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Lilpup, yes, it is illegal in MI
Top of pageBottom of page

Stinger4me
Member
Username: Stinger4me

Post Number: 120
Registered: 08-2007
Posted on Wednesday, November 21, 2007 - 1:39 pm:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Does it matter if the person taping is NOT part of the conversation?
Top of pageBottom of page

Nainrouge
Member
Username: Nainrouge

Post Number: 371
Registered: 05-2006
Posted on Wednesday, November 21, 2007 - 1:41 pm:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Yes, it does matter. If you are part of the conversation - you ARE allowed to tape it without the other persons knowledge. How do you think that undercover reporting works? If this wasn't allowed than half the journalist in Michigan would be in prison.
Top of pageBottom of page

Detx
Member
Username: Detx

Post Number: 46
Registered: 07-2007
Posted on Wednesday, November 21, 2007 - 8:37 pm:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

It is 100 % legal to record a conversation as long as the person recording is a party to the conversation. And I think it’s a federal law that enables this, not a state law.
Top of pageBottom of page

Stinger4me
Member
Username: Stinger4me

Post Number: 121
Registered: 08-2007
Posted on Wednesday, November 21, 2007 - 9:17 pm:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Same thing holds true for phone conversations. It gives a nice record which might be used as a bargaining tool when the other person might be a shithead supervisor.
Top of pageBottom of page

Jimaz
Member
Username: Jimaz

Post Number: 3875
Registered: 12-2005
Posted on Wednesday, November 21, 2007 - 10:32 pm:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

I believe it's not illegal for a participant to tape his conversation without others' knowledge.

I believe it's illegal for a non-participant (an eavesdropper) to disclose to anyone any information intercepted. This is from studying laws regarding HF radio interception of cordless phones.

This is based on federal regulations.

IANAA

Add Your Message Here
Posting is currently disabled in this topic. Contact your discussion moderator for more information.