Discuss Detroit » Archives - January 2008 » Another MI Institution Falls to Feds « Previous Next »
Top of pageBottom of page

Gannon
Member
Username: Gannon

Post Number: 11222
Registered: 12-2003
Posted on Friday, January 04, 2008 - 8:43 am:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

heh

Looks like they finally caught up with Alan Ralsky, the Spam King.


Such a personable fellow, too, he hosted me more than a few times while I worked in his video screening room at his home in West Bloomfield.


One less income stream down to Detroit, thanks to federal intervention, dabbling in an area they arguably should not be in.
Top of pageBottom of page

Johnlodge
Member
Username: Johnlodge

Post Number: 4390
Registered: 10-2003
Posted on Friday, January 04, 2008 - 8:55 am:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Having a hard time finding sympathy on this one. The cost of spam on corporations was estimated at $21.58 BILLION in 2004. The means of obtaining the email addresses are often fraudulent to begin with. Find something productive to do instead of just trying to fleece people of their money while providing no actual service or product.
Top of pageBottom of page

Irish_mafia
Member
Username: Irish_mafia

Post Number: 1169
Registered: 10-2003
Posted on Friday, January 04, 2008 - 8:59 am:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

skinning that personable fellow alive might be a good start
Top of pageBottom of page

Sturge
Member
Username: Sturge

Post Number: 189
Registered: 05-2007
Posted on Friday, January 04, 2008 - 9:14 am:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Pfft! I have zero sympathy for this scumbag. I'm extremely glad the feds nabbed him. I can't believe you support this guy. He rips off people on the internet. Ohh wait...it must be a conspiracy.

(Message edited by sturge on January 04, 2008)
Top of pageBottom of page

Lowell
Board Administrator
Username: Lowell

Post Number: 4418
Registered: 10-2003
Posted on Friday, January 04, 2008 - 9:58 am:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Great news.

How big was Ralsky?

This from www.Spamhaus.org, the top anti-spam site on the web.
quote:

The US Department of Justice went public today with the indictment of Alan Ralsky and 10 others who helped him. Alan Ralsky topped our Top 10 Worst Spammers list for quite some time and was involved in almost any sort spam activity that's being done. His gang frequently sent millions of spam messages per day. In recent years his focus has been on stock spam, and that's a key part of what the US DOJ indicted him for.

We at Spamhaus are of course very pleased at this news. Our specialists work regularly with law enforcement investigating a number of spammers, and while we can never talk about the details, we're delighted that we were able to contribute to this indictment, and that it can now be made public.

Congratulations to all involved with this success!

If you make Spamhaus' top ten you are a first class a*******. It is rare that an American makes this rogue's gallery. This guy might be better off being indicted for child molestation for all the the anger he generated.

And as for the Freeps editing... "This included using false headers in email messages, using proxy computers to repay span [ahem = relay spam}, using falsely registered domain names to send spam and misrepresenting the advertising content of email messages, prosecutors said."
Top of pageBottom of page

Gannon
Member
Username: Gannon

Post Number: 11223
Registered: 12-2003
Posted on Friday, January 04, 2008 - 10:57 am:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Ha!

Whoever said I supported him?

Do any of you actually read?!

Heck, he helped support ME!

I was always honest with him how I felt about his business.
Top of pageBottom of page

Wally
Member
Username: Wally

Post Number: 348
Registered: 12-2003
Posted on Friday, January 04, 2008 - 11:31 am:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

^ Your first post seemed more positive than negative regarding the guy. Actually, it didn't sound negative at all, especially of how personable of a fellow he is and how the gov't should leave him alone comments.

I hope they send that loser down sh!t creek with a broken McDonald's coffee stirrer as a paddle, and a turd sandwich for lunch.
Top of pageBottom of page

Gannon
Member
Username: Gannon

Post Number: 11225
Registered: 12-2003
Posted on Friday, January 04, 2008 - 12:01 pm:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

I think it IS one of the things that the Feds should not be involved in...find some other way to eliminate the internet bother, why make a federal law?

This is another instance where THEY allowed the gap to be exploited, then made some over-reaching law to 'contain' it and save the defenseless, yet inflamed masses.



He IS a personable fellow. ALWAYS impeccable manners, treating workers in his home as if it were THEIRS instead. You meet few folks that successful in ANY industry with such grace. I like the guy but hate what he does for income.


I DID lose some potential income that would be spent within the city of Detroit.


Sure, I'd rather he learn another way to apply those skills, but he found a way to profit off of them...unfortunately at our collective discomfort...but shit on the expense, that is such a bullshit argument.

How much do corporations spend on discarding junk mail sent to their locations? That is the same scenario.


Nah, that said, I basically respect this fellow's ability to become tops in his field, even if it IS one that exists on the grayer side of the economy. He has chutzpah, that is for sure.


I'm as sick of cleaning out my inboxes as the next fellow. Since I found a way to eliminate my junk mail at home, I'd find a way with junk e-mail, too, without Federal help.
Top of pageBottom of page

Zephyrprocess
Member
Username: Zephyrprocess

Post Number: 572
Registered: 08-2006
Posted on Friday, January 04, 2008 - 12:18 pm:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

quote:

I think it IS one of the things that the Feds should not be involved in.

This is not "junk mail."

This was in a pump-and-dump scheme, which can also be run from a phone bank (though much more expensively). Fraud on an international scale should attract federal law enforcement attention.

In addition, his use of botnets misappropriates computing resources from non-consenting individuals.

Good riddance.
Top of pageBottom of page

Dds
Member
Username: Dds

Post Number: 497
Registered: 10-2006
Posted on Friday, January 04, 2008 - 12:23 pm:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

quote:

I'd find a way with junk e-mail, too, without Federal help.



A tinfoil hat for your computer, no doubt.
Top of pageBottom of page

Sturge
Member
Username: Sturge

Post Number: 191
Registered: 05-2007
Posted on Friday, January 04, 2008 - 12:24 pm:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Wow, scamming people is an okay industry for Gannon it seems.

-used unsolicited e-mail to pump up the price of largely worthless stock in Chinese companies
-used illegal methods to maximize the amount of spam that could be sent while evading spam-blocking devices and tricked recipients into opening and acting on advertisements
-charged the group with violating federal spamming laws, money laundering and conspiracy
-tried to send spam using illegal botnets

But what a GREAT guy.


(Message edited by sturge on January 04, 2008)
Top of pageBottom of page

Sturge
Member
Username: Sturge

Post Number: 192
Registered: 05-2007
Posted on Friday, January 04, 2008 - 12:27 pm:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

"You meet few folks that successful in ANY industry with such grace."

Yeah I guess you don't meet to many nice guys in the criminal industry.
Top of pageBottom of page

Viziondetroit
Member
Username: Viziondetroit

Post Number: 1340
Registered: 11-2003
Posted on Friday, January 04, 2008 - 12:30 pm:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

I worked in his video screening room at his home in West Bloomfield.

^^^ what kind of videos? lol
Top of pageBottom of page

Dds
Member
Username: Dds

Post Number: 499
Registered: 10-2006
Posted on Friday, January 04, 2008 - 12:35 pm:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

quote:

Yeah I guess you don't meet to many nice guys in the criminal industry.



I don't know about that. I heard tell that Ted Bundy was quite charming at times.
Top of pageBottom of page

Izzadore
Member
Username: Izzadore

Post Number: 89
Registered: 11-2006
Posted on Friday, January 04, 2008 - 12:35 pm:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Ralsky's a huge figure. Not quite Sanford Wallace or Walt Rines... But they have to know each other. I heard he's into some form of 'above the board' Internet Marketing. They are a tight-knitt group... They payed folks at AGIS to write IEMMC 'safe' email pushes in Dearborn in the mid 90's...

He probably wouldn't have been caught if he were trying to influence the stock market so blatantly. Greed! Greed! Greed!

I'm not so sure about spam. I definitely don't like it but if it's outlawed you might as well outlaw the act of people walking up to you on the street and trying to inform you about a 'good deal' too.
Top of pageBottom of page

Dds
Member
Username: Dds

Post Number: 500
Registered: 10-2006
Posted on Friday, January 04, 2008 - 12:39 pm:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

quote:

I definitely don't like it but if it's outlawed you might as well outlaw the act of people walking up to you on the street and trying to inform you about a 'good deal' too.



Even if about 348 guys a day approach you? And 10 of those guys tape one of their advertisements to your back unbeknownst to you?
Top of pageBottom of page

Sstashmoo
Member
Username: Sstashmoo

Post Number: 841
Registered: 02-2007
Posted on Friday, January 04, 2008 - 12:53 pm:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Too bad the fine is only 250k and 20 years in the pen. These folks cost the average PC user countless money and time in a constant battle against their onslaught. Do the Feds realize how much money these people cost you and I? Not to mention degrading of bandwidth speed by spam softwares continually scanning and blocking data miners, and browser hacks. Throw the book at them, all of them. Total scumbags. They've made the spyware business an multi billion dollar concern. And you and I are paying for it.

There has been a few occasions since 94, that I've had to completely reformat systems to get rid of malicious softwares. Spent days trying all other methods. I had one, as soon as I deleted, it renamed itself and reinstalled. Impossible to get rid of. Got that in the form of a trusted email attachment, we all got nailed. Yes fry these guys.
Top of pageBottom of page

Screamingfit
Member
Username: Screamingfit

Post Number: 32
Registered: 03-2006
Posted on Friday, January 04, 2008 - 1:01 pm:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Sorry if this offends anyone but he got rich off of people's stupidity.
Top of pageBottom of page

Johnlodge
Member
Username: Johnlodge

Post Number: 4397
Registered: 10-2003
Posted on Friday, January 04, 2008 - 1:03 pm:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

No, you are right as far as people actually buying the products or clicking the links. But other non-stupid people are still constantly annoyed and inconvenienced by the crap.
Top of pageBottom of page

Sstashmoo
Member
Username: Sstashmoo

Post Number: 842
Registered: 02-2007
Posted on Friday, January 04, 2008 - 1:07 pm:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

"Sorry if this offends anyone but he got rich off of people's stupidity."

He got rich off of people's ignorance of just how low some scumbags will crawl to take advantage of someone. So now the creep is caught and facing prison time, who is the stupid one?
Top of pageBottom of page

Izzadore
Member
Username: Izzadore

Post Number: 90
Registered: 11-2006
Posted on Friday, January 04, 2008 - 1:49 pm:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

quote:

Even if about 348 guys a day approach you? And 10 of those guys tape one of their advertisements to your back unbeknownst to you?



I did't say I agree with spam but, if, in fact this happened to you tomorrow would you call the police??? Move???

If No, then you can see why the big guys have really not been effected by this.

I think AOL sued Wallace for a few million but he probably settled and paid and kept rollin'.
Top of pageBottom of page

Zephyrprocess
Member
Username: Zephyrprocess

Post Number: 574
Registered: 08-2006
Posted on Friday, January 04, 2008 - 1:50 pm:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

quote:

Sorry if this offends anyone but he got rich off of people's stupidity.

As do all con artists.
Top of pageBottom of page

Zephyrprocess
Member
Username: Zephyrprocess

Post Number: 575
Registered: 08-2006
Posted on Friday, January 04, 2008 - 1:56 pm:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

quote:

quote:

Even if about 348 guys a day approach you? And 10 of those guys tape one of their advertisements to your back unbeknownst to you?
------
I did't say I agree with spam but, if, in fact this happened to you tomorrow would you call the police??? Move???



If someone pasted a billboard-like ad on the side of my house I'd call the police.
Top of pageBottom of page

Sturge
Member
Username: Sturge

Post Number: 193
Registered: 05-2007
Posted on Friday, January 04, 2008 - 1:57 pm:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

"Sorry if this offends anyone but he got rich off of people's stupidity."

And this makes it ok?
Top of pageBottom of page

Dds
Member
Username: Dds

Post Number: 501
Registered: 10-2006
Posted on Friday, January 04, 2008 - 2:07 pm:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

quote:

If someone pasted a billboard-like ad on the side of my house I'd call the police.



Exactly. If someone hacks into my email account and uses it to send out spam, I'd alert the proper authorities. In this case it's the feds. Why? Number one, my provider could shut my account down for misuse (even though I wasn't spamming). And secondly, my money, which I pay to my provider for my account, is being used without permission to run their operation.

I equate it to my neighbor running an extension cord from my garage to his garage to power his beer fridge.
Top of pageBottom of page

Izzadore
Member
Username: Izzadore

Post Number: 91
Registered: 11-2006
Posted on Friday, January 04, 2008 - 2:45 pm:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

quote:

Exactly. If someone hacks into my email account and uses it to send out spam, I'd alert the proper authorities.



That's amatuer, and sloppy. And even worse illegal (Canned Spam act I think.) And, if that ever happened on a subscriber line you'd be getting a call from Comcast or AT&T or whoever. That's only if you were to find out how to open port 25 (Good luck with that my friend.) You can't even do that sort of thing on GoDaddy BUT not cause it's illegal. And yes, GoDaddy shuts people down every day for even one complaint.

Ralsky didn't go down for that. These guys get right next to that line without crossing it.

These people really only run from the Anti-Spammers. The folks who are hard-core against spam. The main players have bodyguards to keep these folks away. They break into houses looking for servers so they can destroy them. It's wild stuff man.

Add Your Message Here
Posting is currently disabled in this topic. Contact your discussion moderator for more information.