Discuss Detroit » Archives - January 2008 » Report: Border gridlock hurts economy « Previous Next »
Top of pageBottom of page

Jams
Member
Username: Jams

Post Number: 7971
Registered: 10-2003
Posted on Sunday, March 23, 2008 - 1:10 pm:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

quote:

TRAVERSE CITY -- Bottlenecks along the U.S.-Canadian border resulting from the terrorism scare are hampering economic growth in the Great Lakes region and should be a front-burner issue in the presidential campaign, says a report being released Sunday.

It urges the two nations to develop a "border of the future," using advanced technology to quicken the movement of people, goods and services without sacrificing needed security measures. They also should upgrade border-area infrastructure such as bridges, rail lines and ports, says the analysis by the Brookings Institution, a policy research organization based in Washington, D.C.

The report argues that a broad swath of territory -- reaching from upstate New York to Minnesota, and across the southern tier of Quebec and Ontario -- is a single economic region linked by the Great Lakes and St. Lawrence River system.

Its future prosperity depends on businesses and governments overcoming provincialism and thinking regionally, said John Austin, director of Brookings' Great Lakes Economic Initiative and one of the report's writers. They should work more cooperatively on research and innovation, environmental protection and promoting renewable energy development and trade, the report says.




http://detnews.com/apps/pbcs.d ll/article?AID=/20080322/METRO /803220456

Something we have been aware of for a while.
Top of pageBottom of page

Gannon
Member
Username: Gannon

Post Number: 11924
Registered: 12-2003
Posted on Sunday, March 23, 2008 - 1:12 pm:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Yes, but this is again a false problem with a pre-determined solution.

EXTEND Homeland Security INTO Canada...probably as part of some NAFTA fine print.


Watch this closely, Jams.
Top of pageBottom of page

Chitaku
Member
Username: Chitaku

Post Number: 1909
Registered: 03-2006
Posted on Sunday, March 23, 2008 - 1:17 pm:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

say no to the North American Union! Seems like as things get worse in this country more folks will wake up.
Top of pageBottom of page

Mcp001
Member
Username: Mcp001

Post Number: 3336
Registered: 11-2003
Posted on Sunday, March 23, 2008 - 1:28 pm:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

I doubt that the Canadians will take too kindly to DHS operating within their borders.

Hell, they cannot do their job correctly on this side of the border. How will shipping them off to Canada make things better?
Top of pageBottom of page

Gannon
Member
Username: Gannon

Post Number: 11925
Registered: 12-2003
Posted on Sunday, March 23, 2008 - 1:41 pm:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Exactly!

(Time to loan the deed some of our empty city-owned land for an extended Jamaican embassy, so we can 'borrow' some of the Jamaican navy to battle off Homeland Security for control of The Straight. It'll solve some other, ahem, problems with urban agriculture experimentation, too. Let's just get rid of the Feds, entirely! They cannot invade foreign embassy property...)
Top of pageBottom of page

Smogboy
Member
Username: Smogboy

Post Number: 7376
Registered: 11-2004
Posted on Sunday, March 23, 2008 - 1:48 pm:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

I've never understood why people don't have to go through some form of security before embarking on the Bridge or the tunnel here at the Detroit/ Windsor crossing. You'd think that Homeland Security would want to screen the scum off BEFORE they'd get across the border. It happens at other US/ Canadian border crossings.
Top of pageBottom of page

Mcp001
Member
Username: Mcp001

Post Number: 3338
Registered: 11-2003
Posted on Sunday, March 23, 2008 - 2:04 pm:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Because we've had the longest undefended border for over a century.

A trip to people into Canada was no different than a trip across town.

Besides, why would the bad guys want to go through the front door?
Top of pageBottom of page

Ray
Member
Username: Ray

Post Number: 1102
Registered: 06-2004
Posted on Sunday, March 23, 2008 - 3:35 pm:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

My question to those who oppose trade with Canada is, why stop at Canada? Why not ban imports from other parts of the US? After all, think of all the jobs we could have in Michigan if we stopped importing goods from Ohio or California? Each state should make make all the goods and services that it consumes. Right?

Trade with Canada is hugely beneficial for both countries. And with the dollar plunging, the US is finally going to reap huge rewards from open trade policies of the past 20 years, and no one will benefit more than manufacturers. Already industrial exports from the US are BOOMING in 2008 and offsetting our other economic problems (a fact rarely reported but readily confirmed online). How tragic if the misguided anti-trade activists screwed over US manufacturing and its workers by retreating from trade.
Top of pageBottom of page

Sstashmoo
Member
Username: Sstashmoo

Post Number: 1227
Registered: 02-2007
Posted on Sunday, March 23, 2008 - 7:16 pm:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

The US is the market everyone else wants to tap into. US companies need to supprt one another. US citizens need to support US businesses and their jobs, Period.

The money is spent and is replaced by a loan. The US is acting like a horrible gambler and China, Saudi Arabia are the house that keeps loaning it back to lose it again.

Add Your Message Here
Posting is currently disabled in this topic. Contact your discussion moderator for more information.