Discuss Detroit » Archives - March 2009 » We're not the Emptiest City « Previous Next »
Top of pageBottom of page

Raptor56
Member
Username: Raptor56

Post Number: 763
Registered: 05-2007
Posted on Tuesday, February 17, 2009 - 8:44 am:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

but we're close...

http://realestate.yahoo.com/pr omo/americas-emptiest-cities.h tml
Top of pageBottom of page

Thejesus
Member
Username: Thejesus

Post Number: 3683
Registered: 06-2008
Posted on Tuesday, February 17, 2009 - 9:31 am:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

may not be the emptiest, but easily the most depressing
Top of pageBottom of page

Roq
Member
Username: Roq

Post Number: 6
Registered: 02-2009
Posted on Tuesday, February 17, 2009 - 9:44 am:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

That article is complete b.s. Vegas is full of people and construction, granted not as much as there used to be but it is by no means empty like Detroit is empty.
Top of pageBottom of page

Iheartthed
Member
Username: Iheartthed

Post Number: 3775
Registered: 04-2006
Posted on Tuesday, February 17, 2009 - 10:01 am:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

quote:

That article is complete b.s. Vegas is full of people and construction, granted not as much as there used to be but it is by no means empty like Detroit is empty.



And what do you base Detroit's emptiness on? Because Detroit has more people and is more densely populated than Vegas. So is there some other measurement that you're using?
Top of pageBottom of page

Thejesus
Member
Username: Thejesus

Post Number: 3685
Registered: 06-2008
Posted on Tuesday, February 17, 2009 - 10:18 am:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

"That article is complete b.s. Vegas is full of people and construction, granted not as much as there used to be but it is by no means empty like Detroit is empty."

Vegas has a large transient population so it is very occupied at any given time, but those people are filling up hotels, not apartments and houses.

The article says Vegas has a population of 2 million, so yes, it's much more populated than Detroit, but that doesn't mean Vegas doesn't have a fuckload of vacant housing that was built in the last several years that is now sitting empty.
Top of pageBottom of page

Iheartthed
Member
Username: Iheartthed

Post Number: 3777
Registered: 04-2006
Posted on Tuesday, February 17, 2009 - 10:23 am:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

quote:

The article says Vegas has a population of 2 million, so yes, it's much more populated than Detroit, but that doesn't mean Vegas doesn't have a fuckload of vacant housing that was built in the last several years that is now sitting empty



Metro Vegas has 2 million people. Vegas is nowhere near the size of Detroit.
Top of pageBottom of page

Retroit
Member
Username: Retroit

Post Number: 973
Registered: 04-2008
Posted on Tuesday, February 17, 2009 - 10:31 am:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Vagas is "empty" because they overbuilt. Detroit is "empty" because people don't like living there.

Edit: "...because MOST people don't like living there." :-)
Top of pageBottom of page

Vas
Member
Username: Vas

Post Number: 465
Registered: 01-2004
Posted on Tuesday, February 17, 2009 - 10:33 am:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

correct. wow. Scholars of the D working without simple factual numbers.
Las Vegas at 9:15am has the strongest feeling of despair I've ever seen.
Top of pageBottom of page

Iheartthed
Member
Username: Iheartthed

Post Number: 3779
Registered: 04-2006
Posted on Tuesday, February 17, 2009 - 10:35 am:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

quote:

Vagas is "empty" because they overbuilt. Detroit is "empty" because people don't like living there.

Edit: "...because MOST people don't like living there." :-)



No... I'd say that Detroit is empty for the same reason(s) as "Vagas".
Top of pageBottom of page

Macknwarren
Member
Username: Macknwarren

Post Number: 129
Registered: 10-2007
Posted on Tuesday, February 17, 2009 - 10:49 am:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

That story tracks only rental vacancies. It has nothing to do with vacant neighborhoods, which are rampant in Detroit but much harder to quantify, especially on a national basis.
Top of pageBottom of page

Thejesus
Member
Username: Thejesus

Post Number: 3686
Registered: 06-2008
Posted on Tuesday, February 17, 2009 - 11:04 am:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

^except that the article doesn't only track rental vacancies.

"Detroit and Las Vegas are among the worst offenders by both measures--the Motor City sports vacancy rates of 19.9% for rentals and 4% for homes; Sin City has rates of 16% and 4.7%, respectively."
Top of pageBottom of page

Gmich99
Member
Username: Gmich99

Post Number: 245
Registered: 11-2005
Posted on Tuesday, February 17, 2009 - 11:36 am:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

What would Detroit's vacancy numbers look like if the empty parking lots where buildings one stood or and feral fields where whole blocks of houses once stood were included? There is no comparison to Detroit. Detroit is the most vacant large city in America. It is not even a debate.

(Message edited by gmich99 on February 17, 2009)
Top of pageBottom of page

Iheartthed
Member
Username: Iheartthed

Post Number: 3780
Registered: 04-2006
Posted on Tuesday, February 17, 2009 - 11:40 am:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

quote:

What would Detroit's vacancy numbers look like if the empty parking lots where buildings one stood or feral fields where whole blocks of houses once stood? There is no comparison to Detroit. Detroit is the most vacant large city in America. It is not even a debate.



Okay, but there are no buildings standing where surface parking lots exist by virtue of physics. So if you want to change the laws of physics then yes, Detroit's vacancy rate would be much higher.

But even if you did have some type of freaky vacant building/surface parking lot mutant, Detroit's population density would still be much higher than "Vagas"'s... Unless you again changed the physical laws that calculate density as the amount of people in a finite space.
Top of pageBottom of page

Gmich99
Member
Username: Gmich99

Post Number: 247
Registered: 11-2005
Posted on Tuesday, February 17, 2009 - 11:57 am:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Population density is not very telling in the comparison of Detroit to other large cities. Unquestionably there are still a lot of people living in proximity to each other in Detroit neighborhoods. But abandoned buildings in their various states of decay, from merely boarded up, to buildings awaiting the fate of "Slumpy," to bulldozed are not factored into vacancy rates. I am unable to imagine another American city with as many parcels of land that sit entirely empty where a building once stood, sit in unusable ruin, or sit boarded up with no prospect of tenancy.
Top of pageBottom of page

Bobl
Member
Username: Bobl

Post Number: 504
Registered: 07-2008
Posted on Tuesday, February 17, 2009 - 12:05 pm:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Each time I visit Las Vegas, Lake Mead is visibly lower. They might soon be in serious trouble, as the Lake is in "drought stage" and still falling. Too many people have moved into what is actually a desert.
Their future may not be as bright as their casino lights.
Top of pageBottom of page

Gmich99
Member
Username: Gmich99

Post Number: 249
Registered: 11-2005
Posted on Tuesday, February 17, 2009 - 12:15 pm:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

The idiocracy of unbridled sprawl and the certain inability of areas like Vegas and Phoenix to sustain such large populations on a finite and dwindling fresh water supply is little consultation for cities like Detroit that have been crippled by the population and financial shift.

(Message edited by gmich99 on February 17, 2009)
Top of pageBottom of page

Roq
Member
Username: Roq

Post Number: 7
Registered: 02-2009
Posted on Tuesday, February 17, 2009 - 12:34 pm:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

"And what do you base Detroit's emptiness on? Because Detroit has more people and is more densely populated than Vegas. So is there some other measurement that you're using?"

I base it on when I walk downtown in Detroit, there are hardly any people around (not counting panhandlers) unless a game or event is going on.

In Vegas, I'm bumping into people left and right both on the strip and in the old downtown.

Like someone else mentioned, there is no comparison between Vegas empty and Detroit empty.
Top of pageBottom of page

Iheartthed
Member
Username: Iheartthed

Post Number: 3781
Registered: 04-2006
Posted on Tuesday, February 17, 2009 - 12:38 pm:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

quote:

I base it on when I walk downtown in Detroit, there are hardly any people around (not counting panhandlers) unless a game or event is going on.

In Vegas, I'm bumping into people left and right both on the strip and in the old downtown.



Okay, so like I thought, you don't have a point. You compare one of the biggest tourist attractions in the world to downtown Detroit in order to compare "emptiness". Why not just compare Disney World to downtown Detroit to make the same conclusion?
Top of pageBottom of page

Diehard
Member
Username: Diehard

Post Number: 665
Registered: 03-2005
Posted on Tuesday, February 17, 2009 - 1:00 pm:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Each time I visit Las Vegas, Lake Mead is visibly lower. They might soon be in serious trouble, as the Lake is in "drought stage" and still falling. Too many people have moved into what is actually a desert.
I, for one, am not crying for all those developers who built on spec out in the middle of a sandbox. Let them lose their shirts. We as a society should know better.
As for Detroit, better times may be coming. Water is the new oil.
Top of pageBottom of page

Islandman
Member
Username: Islandman

Post Number: 1968
Registered: 08-2004
Posted on Tuesday, February 17, 2009 - 2:17 pm:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Good point Diehard. I know a few people that stay in Detroit because of the water resources. Yes, they are waiting for a Mad Max scenario. Population could double overnight. :-)
Top of pageBottom of page

Roq
Member
Username: Roq

Post Number: 8
Registered: 02-2009
Posted on Tuesday, February 17, 2009 - 2:38 pm:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

"You compare one of the biggest tourist attractions in the world to downtown Detroit in order to compare "emptiness"

I didn't compare them, Yahoo did and I called bullshit because anyone with two functioning eyeballs in their head can go to each city and determine which one is emptier. Here's a clue, it isn't Vegas.
Top of pageBottom of page

Hudkina
Member
Username: Hudkina

Post Number: 337
Registered: 12-2004
Posted on Tuesday, February 17, 2009 - 6:01 pm:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Roq, you don't even know what that Forbes article is comparing. (Hell you can't even get the source of the article right...)

I agree that this "ranking" is ridiculous, but using the criteria that Forbes did, that is how they rank.

First of all, they are ranking metropolitan areas. For Detroit that includes all of Wayne, Oakland, Macomb, Livingston, St. Clair, and Lapeer Counties. For Las Vegas that includes Clark County.

Secondly, they are only comparing the vacancy rates for rentals and "for-sale" homes. It's not taking into account empty seasonal housing, "abandoned" housing, etc. It's certainly not taking into account land that onced had housing, but currently doesn't...

All they did was look up the information on these two pages:

Rental Vacancies:
http://www.census.gov/hhes/www /housing/hvs/annual07/ann07t5. html

Homeowner Vacancies:
http://www.census.gov/hhes/www /housing/hvs/annual07/ann07t6. html

They ranked them from #1 to #75 in each category, and then consolidated the rankings.
Top of pageBottom of page

Hudkina
Member
Username: Hudkina

Post Number: 338
Registered: 12-2004
Posted on Tuesday, February 17, 2009 - 6:05 pm:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

It's just another example of a 5 minute "study" that Forbes did to get on the front page of Yahoo.com in a way to draw people to their own website and generate ad revenue.

If you're looking for a intensive study on the actual land-use of major cities, you're not going to find it in a Forbes.com article...
Top of pageBottom of page

N7hn
Member
Username: N7hn

Post Number: 175
Registered: 02-2008
Posted on Tuesday, February 17, 2009 - 8:57 pm:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

well. Even if there is a high vacancy rate in vegas now, thing is vegas will rebound alot faster that detroit probably will. At least people GO TO Vegas and still have a mostly positive image of the city

(Message edited by n7hn on February 17, 2009)
Top of pageBottom of page

Lmichigan
Member
Username: Lmichigan

Post Number: 4135
Registered: 10-2003
Posted on Tuesday, February 17, 2009 - 9:27 pm:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

It seems like a double posting of the same article every other day now.

It's already been done and not even days ago:

America's Emptiest Cities
Top of pageBottom of page

French777
Member
Username: French777

Post Number: 690
Registered: 10-2006
Posted on Tuesday, February 17, 2009 - 9:32 pm:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

I kinda like having all Downtown to Myself on a Sunday morning!

Even-though thats not good news for the city ..

Add Your Message Here
Posting is currently disabled in this topic. Contact your discussion moderator for more information.