Discuss Detroit » NON-DETROIT ISSUES » President Bozo.............. « Previous Next »
Top of pageBottom of page

1kielsondrive
Member
Username: 1kielsondrive

Post Number: 1104
Registered: 08-2008
Posted on Saturday, March 21, 2009 - 1:52 pm:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

One of the funniest photos I've seen in a while. And accurate too.

Top of pageBottom of page

Bigb23
Member
Username: Bigb23

Post Number: 4260
Registered: 11-2007
Posted on Saturday, March 21, 2009 - 6:29 pm:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)





(Message edited by Bigb23 on March 22, 2009)
Top of pageBottom of page

Pam
Member
Username: Pam

Post Number: 5139
Registered: 11-2005
Posted on Saturday, March 21, 2009 - 6:49 pm:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

EX-Pres. Bozo you mean.
Top of pageBottom of page

Bigb23
Member
Username: Bigb23

Post Number: 4263
Registered: 11-2007
Posted on Saturday, March 21, 2009 - 6:55 pm:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

No- I mean Hoover villes, which makes my tent a hot commodity. Ebay + $100.
Top of pageBottom of page

Jimaz
Member
Username: Jimaz

Post Number: 6832
Registered: 12-2005
Posted on Saturday, March 21, 2009 - 8:52 pm:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Speaking of Hoovervilles, this story was in today's Detroit News: Newly homeless occupy Sacramento's tent city
quote:

The capital's tent city, sprawling messily on a grassed-over landfill, is home to some 200 men and women with nowhere else to go.

It has been here for more than a year, but in the last three weeks it has been transformed into a vivid symbol of a financial crisis otherwise invisible to many Americans.

The Depression had Hoovervilles. The energy crisis had snaking gas lines. The state's droughts have empty reservoirs and browned lawns. But today's deep recession is about disappearing wealth -- painful, yes, but difficult to see....

CeCe Walker, 48, back from coffee, breakfast and a shower at Maryhouse, a daytime shelter for women, lugged a bag of ice for a half-mile.

"I've never camped in my life," she said, sorting through supplies damp from yesterday's melted ice. "This will make you old. I don't see how people want to live out here forever. God!"

Top of pageBottom of page

Flanders_field
Member
Username: Flanders_field

Post Number: 1849
Registered: 01-2008
Posted on Saturday, March 21, 2009 - 9:50 pm:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Bush wasn't a clown, he was a marionette whose strings were pulled by Dick (puppetmaster) Cheney and his neocon advisors. "Decider", my ass, he was more like a rubber stamp:

"Over objections from the U.S. intelligence community, the White House is moving to declassify—and publicly release—three internal memos that will lay out, for the first time, details of the "enhanced" interrogation techniques approved by the Bush administration for use against "high value" Qaeda detainees. The memos, written by Justice Department lawyers in May 2005, provide the legal rationale for waterboarding, head slapping and other rough tactics used by the CIA. One senior Obama official, who like others interviewed for this story requested anonymity because of the issue's sensitivity, said the memos were "ugly" and could embarrass the CIA. Other officials predicted they would fuel demands for a "truth commission" on torture."

~snip~

"The debate about torture ramped up again last week with an account in the New York Review of Books about a secret International Red Cross report that was delivered to the CIA in February 2007. The report, according to journalist Mark Danner, quotes detainees describing, often in gruesome detail, how they were locked in coffin-size boxes; swung by towels around their necks into plywood walls; and forced to stand naked for days while their arms were shackled above their heads."

Coming Soon: Declassified Bush-Era Torture Memos
Top of pageBottom of page

Mr_onion
Member
Username: Mr_onion

Post Number: 64
Registered: 11-2003
Posted on Saturday, March 21, 2009 - 10:07 pm:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Its only Fair,


bozama
Top of pageBottom of page

Ccbatson
Member
Username: Ccbatson

Post Number: 19568
Registered: 11-2006
Posted on Saturday, March 21, 2009 - 11:39 pm:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Looking backward again libs?
Top of pageBottom of page

Flanders_field
Member
Username: Flanders_field

Post Number: 1850
Registered: 01-2008
Posted on Sunday, March 22, 2009 - 12:52 am:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

quote:

Looking backward again libs?




Ccbatson
Member
Username: Ccbatson

Post Number: 19531
Registered: 11-2006

Posted on Thursday, March 19, 2009 - 4:22 pm:

Not the whole mess. Liberals over the last 80 years or so...including Carter in a larger way than most (but not all) of the villains in this story.

Ccbatson
Member
Username: Ccbatson

Post Number: 19072
Registered: 11-2006

Posted on Friday, February 27, 2009 - 9:26 pm:

LBJ, FDR, Carter...to a lesser extent Clinton....these are the villains.

Ccbatson
Member
Username: Ccbatson

Post Number: 18992
Registered: 11-2006


Posted on Monday, February 23, 2009 - 11:18 pm:

Too shallow...the root is socialized housing via the CRA in the 70s (Carter). The root of that is creeping socialism...FDR/new deal in the 30s, and LBJ/great society in the early 70s.




Top of pageBottom of page

Ccbatson
Member
Username: Ccbatson

Post Number: 19589
Registered: 11-2006
Posted on Sunday, March 22, 2009 - 4:30 pm:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Relevant history given our current situation economically.

Not irrelevant bitter drivel regarding Iraq and the like.
Top of pageBottom of page

Ccbatson
Member
Username: Ccbatson

Post Number: 19592
Registered: 11-2006
Posted on Sunday, March 22, 2009 - 4:36 pm:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Left alone unless currently relevant concerns stem from that time.
Top of pageBottom of page

Thejesus
Member
Username: Thejesus

Post Number: 3795
Registered: 06-2008
Posted on Sunday, March 22, 2009 - 4:36 pm:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Wow. That's quite a bitchslapping you just received, Batz.
Top of pageBottom of page

Ccbatson
Member
Username: Ccbatson

Post Number: 19594
Registered: 11-2006
Posted on Sunday, March 22, 2009 - 4:40 pm:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

An attempt easily shot down in 2 sentences.

Not even a challenge.
Top of pageBottom of page

Flanders_field
Member
Username: Flanders_field

Post Number: 1852
Registered: 01-2008
Posted on Sunday, March 22, 2009 - 4:44 pm:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

GOP had a majority Congress and Republican-lite in Bill Clinton in the mid-90s. They also held the executive office and Congress for most of the past 8 years. More than enough time to change whatever change they felt needed to be done. If the GOP caved to Democrats, then that is complicity and clearly weakness on their part. Reaching past even Reagan to put the blame on Carter or even further to FDR is not only ridiculous, but is also delusional as well.
Top of pageBottom of page

Ccbatson
Member
Username: Ccbatson

Post Number: 19597
Registered: 11-2006
Posted on Sunday, March 22, 2009 - 4:53 pm:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Dream on (me too). Rescinding and phasing out entitlements can be impossible. Notice some of them have been left in place for decades and through many administrations and congressional configurations.

This is what is most concerning about about Obama.

Reagan gives some hope for the future as a model of what can be done in a short period of time.
Top of pageBottom of page

Ccbatson
Member
Username: Ccbatson

Post Number: 19598
Registered: 11-2006
Posted on Sunday, March 22, 2009 - 4:53 pm:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Dream on (me too). Rescinding and phasing out entitlements can be impossible. Notice some of them have been left in place for decades and through many administrations and congressional configurations.

This is what is most concerning about about Obama.

Reagan gives some hope for the future as a model of what can be done in a short period of time.
Top of pageBottom of page

1kielsondrive
Member
Username: 1kielsondrive

Post Number: 1116
Registered: 08-2008
Posted on Sunday, March 22, 2009 - 11:40 pm:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Okay Flanders, Bush was a marionette clown. Satisfied?
Top of pageBottom of page

1kielsondrive
Member
Username: 1kielsondrive

Post Number: 1117
Registered: 08-2008
Posted on Sunday, March 22, 2009 - 11:43 pm:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Hey Flanders, nice picture. A right wing-nut neo con. Caught in action.
Top of pageBottom of page

1kielsondrive
Member
Username: 1kielsondrive

Post Number: 1118
Registered: 08-2008
Posted on Sunday, March 22, 2009 - 11:44 pm:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Bigb, your clown photos continue to get better.
Top of pageBottom of page

D_mcc
Member
Username: D_mcc

Post Number: 1760
Registered: 12-2007
Posted on Monday, March 23, 2009 - 12:30 am:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Fine CC...if FDR is to Blame...I think Hoover had a part to play in this economic crisis...shit...Wilson and his damn League of Nations and entry into the Great War all but ended our policy of isolationism...
Top of pageBottom of page

Bigb23
Member
Username: Bigb23

Post Number: 4278
Registered: 11-2007
Posted on Monday, March 23, 2009 - 12:42 am:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Don't let Cc rile you. He is what he is. A one sided barker.
Top of pageBottom of page

Flanders_field
Member
Username: Flanders_field

Post Number: 1853
Registered: 01-2008
Posted on Monday, March 23, 2009 - 9:35 am:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

quote:

Relevant history given our current situation economically.



The occupations of Iraq and Afghanistan are definitely relevant to our current economic situation.

quote:

Not irrelevant bitter drivel regarding Iraq and the like.



The inquiries, investigations, and release of information pertaining to the legitimacy/prosecution and the operations/management of them are certainly not irrelevant emotionally bitter drivel, but your response demonstrates an effort to trivialize them. Had the PNAC neocons in DC been correct on their well-publicized timeframes and the "reception" received in Iraq and Afghanistan, these invasions and subsequent occupations would have now long been finished and the troops withdrawn.

quote:

Left alone unless currently relevant concerns stem from that time.



Unfortunately, the statute of limitations hasn't run out on them yet Ccbatson, much as you would like them to be. Apparently those with far more power and authority than you have, will be making the decisions on what is currently relevant, and what isn't.

(Message edited by Flanders_field on March 23, 2009)
Top of pageBottom of page

Flanders_field
Member
Username: Flanders_field

Post Number: 1854
Registered: 01-2008
Posted on Monday, March 23, 2009 - 12:14 pm:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

quote:

Okay Flanders, Bush was a marionette clown. Satisfied?



Come to think of it, I am wrong. You are correct 1kd, he is a clown, now that his strings have been cut from the executive office. Apparently we can soon see him perform solo under the big tent in SW MI, as well as his wif..er...former Secretary Of State Condi Rice:

Bush, Rice Expected to Speak in Southwest Michigan
Top of pageBottom of page

Thejesus
Member
Username: Thejesus

Post Number: 3799
Registered: 06-2008
Posted on Monday, March 23, 2009 - 1:34 pm:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

"An attempt easily shot down in 2 sentences."

Except you didn't shoot it down.

Your post contained an implicit argument that people should avoid looking backward. Then, after flanders demonstrated how you were guilty of the same behavior, you tried to create an exception to your argument so that it wouldn't apply to your previous statements.

Pretty transparent, Batz.
Top of pageBottom of page

Ccbatson
Member
Username: Ccbatson

Post Number: 19604
Registered: 11-2006
Posted on Monday, March 23, 2009 - 3:41 pm:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Iraq and Afghanistan are trivial at most when it comes to the problems with our rapidly socializing economy. If anything, in the long run, the ousting of Sadaam, and the Taliban, will have been well worth the price in terms of our security (militarily and economically).
Top of pageBottom of page

1kielsondrive
Member
Username: 1kielsondrive

Post Number: 1127
Registered: 08-2008
Posted on Tuesday, March 24, 2009 - 12:05 am:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

The most ever socializing of our economy happened in the waining days of the former President Bozo's administration. The right wing, neo-con, nut jobs managed to socialize all of our failed uni-partisan, pre-emptive, war efforts and costs as well as the 'free market' gambling losses of our elite, ruling, oligarchs, to the middle and lower classes. That's the kind of socializing the fundamentalists just love, and never own up to. Yep, it's really evil unless the money's flowing into the coffers of the ultra rich, which is the way it usually works.
Top of pageBottom of page

Ferntruth
Member
Username: Ferntruth

Post Number: 798
Registered: 11-2006
Posted on Tuesday, March 24, 2009 - 12:23 pm:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

"Pretty transparent, Batz."

Yeah, to everyone but him apparently.
Top of pageBottom of page

Ccbatson
Member
Username: Ccbatson

Post Number: 19628
Registered: 11-2006
Posted on Tuesday, March 24, 2009 - 4:59 pm:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Correct Kielsondrive...GWB took a leap off the socialist cliff at the end there. Being a liberal, you must have started to like GWB at that point, right?
Top of pageBottom of page

Flanders_field
Member
Username: Flanders_field

Post Number: 1867
Registered: 01-2008
Posted on Friday, March 27, 2009 - 6:06 pm:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

"It's been a rough decade for the Small Business Administration. The Bush administration slashed its budget by more than half, and many of its most experienced and knowledgeable employees were let go. To make matters worse, multiple investigations have found evidence of waste, fraud, and abuse at the agency, which is supposed to help small businesses drive economic growth. On Wednesday, the embattled agency was dealt another blow when the Government Accountability Office revealed that the SBA's $8 billion program designed to funnel government contracts to small businesses in poor areas gave millions to companies that did not meet the legal requirements, including one that was "headquartered" in a trailer home occupied by someone unrelated to the company. Some of the owners of the "small businesses" in question admitted straight-out to the GAO that they were defrauding the SBA's HUBZone program by funnelling money to big businesses or businesses outside the zones."

~snip~

"Rep. Nydia Velasquez (D-NY), the chair of the House small business committee, has talked of shutting down the HUBZone program entirely. But Gunn says far more drastic measures need to be taken. "If the best they can come up with is to end the program then we're all in trouble," Gunn says. His organization is working on legislation with Rep. Hank Johnson (D-Ga.) to preclude publicly-traded companies from being counted towards the government's small business procurement goals. That move that would keep companies like Raytheon, Honda and 3M (and their subsidiaries), which have received federal small business contracts in the past, from receiving them in the future."

Bush Leaves Legacy of Fraud and Abuse At Small Business Administration

In less than four months, and likely just the tip of the iceberg of corruption, fraud, waste and criminal activities being exposed so far during the Chimp's administration.





(Message edited by Flanders_field on March 27, 2009)
Top of pageBottom of page

Ccbatson
Member
Username: Ccbatson

Post Number: 19707
Registered: 11-2006
Posted on Saturday, March 28, 2009 - 12:48 am:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Here is a clue...look at the names of these bureaucratic entities..."small business administration". Government is not supposed to be administrating small, or any, businesses.

Add Your Message Here
Posting is currently disabled in this topic. Contact your discussion moderator for more information.