Discuss Detroit » Archives - Beginning January 2006 » Three Detroit Catholic Churches Closing (so far) « Previous Next »
Top of pageBottom of page

Genius
Member
Username: Genius

Post Number: 20
Registered: 03-2005
Posted From: 64.12.116.204
Posted on Saturday, March 25, 2006 - 12:09 am:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

The first three Catholic church closings for this year have been publicized: Guardian Angels (Kelly Rd. north of Houston Whittier) and St. Brendan (Beaconsfield & Morang) on the far east side of Detroit, and Martyrs of Uganda (Rosa Parks & Bethune) on the near west side. Stay tuned for the press conference next Wednesday.

http://www.freep.com/apps/pbcs .dll/article?AID=/20060322/NEW S05/603220307
Top of pageBottom of page

Mackinaw
Member
Username: Mackinaw

Post Number: 1292
Registered: 02-2005
Posted From: 141.213.173.94
Posted on Saturday, March 25, 2006 - 12:07 pm:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

I think with this we've passed the peak when it comes to closing churches in Detroit. Most of the rest seem to be pretty sustainable, and they are often landmarks in themselves.

Coming Wednesday, I'd expect about 10 inner-ring parishes to be closed or merged. This will be a wake-up call for many suburbanites as to just how catastrophically rampant our sprawl is. Livonia and Southfield really aren't shrinking, but the demographics are shifting, and other places to the N/W are growing so extremely fast. The closing of a bedrock community institution like a church, because of the need to reallocate priests to sprawlville, should really accentuate our sprawl problem, and point to the need of the inner ring to get it together when it comes to making themselves marketable.
Top of pageBottom of page

Jt1
Member
Username: Jt1

Post Number: 7059
Registered: 10-2003
Posted From: 66.2.148.98
Posted on Saturday, March 25, 2006 - 12:30 pm:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

So what is the Detroit ADs responsibility for the buildings themselves. Will they let them rot? Board them up and walk away?

How they manage their closed buildings will speak about the integrity of Maida and his plan.
Top of pageBottom of page

Valkyrias
Member
Username: Valkyrias

Post Number: 222
Registered: 02-2005
Posted From: 69.47.103.87
Posted on Saturday, March 25, 2006 - 12:37 pm:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

i already know for a fact (and for some time now) that the 4 churches in southfield will be merging...i think i mentioned this on another thread that mentioned st. bede school in southfield is closing. i don't think the it's so much that the priests need to be reallocated to growing parishes in sprawlville but rather the demographics are changing, as you also mentioned. i will say it does make it more convenient to spread around the few resources they have.
Top of pageBottom of page

Valkyrias
Member
Username: Valkyrias

Post Number: 223
Registered: 02-2005
Posted From: 69.47.103.87
Posted on Saturday, March 25, 2006 - 12:43 pm:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

jt1...i wouldn't be surprised if they sell them off. several years ago, when they closed st. anthony on 9 mile and evegreen, they sold it to another faith group. the seminary there was also sold to some other educational insitution. i'm not sure if they do that with all of their churches and related buildings that they close, but if they close st. bede's in southfield, they would be dumb to not try and sell it because that is prime property over at 12 and southfield. and although that is the largest of all the parishes in southfield and could hold all 4, i would not be surprised if they closed it so they could recoup some money.
Top of pageBottom of page

Jt1
Member
Username: Jt1

Post Number: 7060
Registered: 10-2003
Posted From: 66.2.149.88
Posted on Saturday, March 25, 2006 - 12:54 pm:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Nothing wrong with that. It would make sense and bring in some money for the church. I just don't want them to walk away from the responsibility or selling for $1 to some speculator or someone that can not maintain the building.
Top of pageBottom of page

Southwestmap
Member
Username: Southwestmap

Post Number: 434
Registered: 01-2005
Posted From: 64.79.90.206
Posted on Monday, March 27, 2006 - 10:57 am:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Jt1,I think that a good example of how the AofD will manage the closed church buildings can be seen in what happened to Mt. Martin's. The building has been mothballed for more than 10 years. It is beautifully maintained. The grounds are kept clean and cut. The priest's house, a beautiful attached building, has been consistantly rented to non-profit groups. The plan was to keep the church to see what would shake out in that riverside neighborhood. Maybe Catholics would move back into the new housing, etc. That hasn't happened and, as well, St. Ambrose church is very close. So now the A of D os entertaining three proposals for the property - one of which is from a Baptist church congregation. All three proposals are compatible uses - but I believe the other two will involve tearing down the church.

I have not seen one example of the A of D being a slum landlord. Can any one else provide one?

Its true, however, that in the last round of closings (more than a decade ago) the A of D sold off church buildings and plants at way below their value to church congregations that had dreamy plans but absolutely no real finances to keep the buildings up. This caused a lot of the new congregations to abandon or re-sell the properties and led to the horrible state that many of those originally Catolic churches are in now. I hope that the A of D can figure out a way to avoid this happening again.
Top of pageBottom of page

Kathleen
Member
Username: Kathleen

Post Number: 1253
Registered: 10-2003
Posted From: 69.14.122.57
Posted on Saturday, April 01, 2006 - 10:25 am:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Nothing real surprising in the Archdiocese's reorganization plan:

•BY JUNE

Detroit: Closing -- Guardian Angels, Martyrs of Uganda, St. Brendan

Merging -- St. Anthony and Annunciation/Our Lady of Sorrows; Immaculate Heart of Mary and St. Gerard

Creating a cluster or merger plan -- Our Lady of Good Counsel, Our Lady Queen of Heaven and St. Raymond

Dearborn: Creating a merger plan -- St. Joseph and St. Martha

Hamtramck: Creating a merger plan -- St. Ladislaus (partner to be determined)

Warren: Creating merger plans -- St. Cletus and St. Louise; Ascension, St. Dorothy and St. Leonard

Livonia: Clustering -- St. Genevieve and St. Maurice

•IN FALL

Dearborn Heights: Creating merger plan -- St. Albert the Great and St. John the Baptist

Dearborn/Detroit: Creating cluster or merger plan -- St. Alphonsus, St. Barbara, St. Clement, all in Dearborn, and St. Cunegunda in Detroit

Memphis/Smiths Creek/Columbus: Clustered parishes to realign -- All Saints in Memphis, Holy Rosary Mission in Smiths Creek, St. Philip Neri in Columbus

Marine City/Algonac/Harsens Island: Clustered parishes that will realign -- Holy Cross in Marine City, St. Catherine of Alexandria in Algonac and St. Mark on Harsens Island

Monroe area: 14 parishes must submit cluster or merger plans

Port Huron area: Five parishes will be reduced by one -- St. Edward on the Lake in Lakeport; St. Mary, St. Joseph and St. Stephen, all in Port Huron, and St. Christopher in Marysville

•TO SUBMIT CLUSTER PLANS BY DECEMBER

Downriver:

Christ the Good Shepherd and St. Henry, both in Lincoln Park, and St. Pius X of Southgate

Our Lady of Lourdes in River Rouge, St. Francis Xavier in Ecorse, St. Elizabeth and St. Helena, both in Wyandotte

Our Lady of Mt. Carmel and St. Stanislaus Kostka, both in Wyandotte

Our Lady of the Woods, Woodhaven, St. Roch and St. Victor, both in Gibraltar

St. Francis Cabrini in Allen Park and St. Hugh in Southgate

St. Joseph and St. Patrick, both in Wyandotte

St. Joseph and St. Timothy, both in Trenton, and St. Cyprian in Riverview and Sacred Heart in Grosse Ile

St. Alfred, St. Constance, St. Cyril and St. Paschal, all in Taylor

Detroit: Our Lady Help of Christians and Transfiguration. Also, St. Louis (partner to be determined)

Hamtramck: St. Florian and Our Lady Queen of Apostles

Westland: Divine Savior and St. Theodore; St. Richard and SS. Simon and Jude

Westland/Garden City: St. Raphael and St. Dunstan, both in Garden City, and St. Damian in Westland

Dearborn Heights: St. Mel, St. Sabina

East side: Our Lady Queen of All Saints in Fraser and St. Donald in Roseville

Holy Innocents in Roseville and St. Barnabas in Eastpointe

St. Basil and St. Veronica, both in Eastpointe

St. Germaine and St. Gertrude in St. Clair Shores

•TO MERGE IN 2007

Southfield: St. Beatrice, St. Bede, St. Ives and St. Michael

Clinton Township: St. Claude and St. Thecla; St. Louis and St. Valerie

•TO CLOSE IN 2007

Detroit: St. John Cantius

•TO MERGE OR CLUSTER IN THE FUTURE

Troy/Birmingham: St. Alan in Troy and St. Columban in Birmingham

Harper Woods: Our Lady Queen of Peace and St. Peter the Apostle

•TO MERGE OR CLOSE WHEN PASTOR LEAVES

Detroit: St. Andrew, St. Anthony (Lithuanian) and Our Lady of Mt. Carmel

Redford: St. John Bosco

Westland: St. Bernardine of Siena

•TO BE STUDIED FOR NEW CHURCHES

Northern Oakland: Davisburg mass station

Northern Macomb: St. Maximilian Kolbe

More details in these Freep articles:
http://www.freep.com/apps/pbcs .dll/article?AID=/20060330/NEW S05/603300460

http://www.freep.com/apps/pbcs .dll/article?AID=/20060330/NEW S05/603300459
Top of pageBottom of page

Alexei289
Member
Username: Alexei289

Post Number: 1094
Registered: 11-2004
Posted From: 68.61.183.223
Posted on Saturday, April 01, 2006 - 9:51 pm:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

.. The Catholic church should be the LAST organization to encourage sprawl.. Typically they are the first one in and the last to leave... and the fact that churches are even being sold off or demolished is so against church doctrine, that less than 50 years ago, the outcry would be incredible.

I cannot believe that the church is succumbing to this mentality.... Churches are built like they are for the reason that they are supposed to be permanent. Newer ones now look like office buildings at best, dungeons at worst.

I could go on but im disgusted...
Top of pageBottom of page

The_aram
Member
Username: The_aram

Post Number: 4754
Registered: 10-2003
Posted From: 141.213.175.233
Posted on Saturday, April 01, 2006 - 10:47 pm:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)


quote:

and the fact that churches are even being sold off or demolished is so against church doctrine




Explain.

If there aren't enough parishioners to support a church, with the associated costs of a priest, staff, etc., why shouldn't it close? I don't think the church is the least bit concerned about your self-righteous rant about sprawl as it is about being able to minimize its financial burdens. Like it or not, organized religion is accountable for financial responsibility. They are also responsible for keeping up with their flock as they migrate. The fault isn't with the church administration.
Top of pageBottom of page

Kova
Member
Username: Kova

Post Number: 204
Registered: 12-2003
Posted From: 141.213.184.173
Posted on Saturday, April 01, 2006 - 11:26 pm:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

The AoD MUST take some of the blame. They haven’t given 2 cents about the inner ring areas for decades, let alone Detroit. Numerous parishes throughout the years have put forth plans to make their parish communities viable. Many were submitted downtown and the response.... none. Maida has continued to choose incompetent and egotistic advisors which can also share some of the blame. Money to the John Paul center in DC? Millions spent on the cathedral? Does Maida even LIVE in Detroit anymore? The Church has also been ineffective in speaking out against sprawl for decades.

The only differnce between Maida and Shaka is that Maida makes it look like parishes had a say in it. Which, in a very limited sense, is true. Either way both got what they wanted.

(Message edited by KOVA on April 01, 2006)
Top of pageBottom of page

Futurecity
Member
Username: Futurecity

Post Number: 263
Registered: 05-2005
Posted From: 69.212.44.48
Posted on Sunday, April 02, 2006 - 3:19 am:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

The AoD is pro-sprawl. Big time.
Top of pageBottom of page

Alexei289
Member
Username: Alexei289

Post Number: 1095
Registered: 11-2004
Posted From: 68.61.183.223
Posted on Sunday, April 02, 2006 - 7:12 am:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Churches are consecrated to the holy sacrement... which to those that are not catholic, is a huge deal.. Its a place where every sunday, a miracle will be performed... the transubstantiation of body to bread, and blood to wine.

In each and every church, is a relic, a remnant of a saint... usually a bone or an article of clothing permanently entombed in the stone altar of that church, or if the altar is made of wood, the tabernacle must be made of stone, in which the relic will be permanently placed. In most churches, the alter is made of stone, and the tabbernacle made of gold plated steel. THe host and the consecrated sacrement in the tritentine mass never touch other than gold plate, or a priests hands who is in a state of grace... (if he had committed any sins, he confessed them and has atoned). A polished marble tabernacle or altar, or your toung.
Quite fitting for the king of kings, literally the most pure and best treatment we can give his body that we as humans know of.

So time change after 2000 years and we jsut DETSTROY this rite and the churches in which his holy endowed saints are buried? Im sorry... but the realm beyond this one deserves better consideration. Times may change, but god remains constant. His body and blood deserve better treatment than what these new churches are giving him.

In many churches today, materials are used that we would not even use in our own house.... Let alone the body and blood of our lord... who literally gave himself up to be mangled, ripped apart, and die a slow death so that he may not only prove that he knows what it is like to be us.. and to suffer... but to do it so that we may have a life after this one.

Im sorry, but he deserves a grand church... not an office dungeon.
Top of pageBottom of page

Bostedguy
Member
Username: Bostedguy

Post Number: 340
Registered: 07-2005
Posted From: 69.246.19.150
Posted on Sunday, April 02, 2006 - 9:09 am:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Szoka was the previous Cardinal.
Top of pageBottom of page

Hamtramck_steve
Member
Username: Hamtramck_steve

Post Number: 2854
Registered: 10-2003
Posted From: 69.209.138.61
Posted on Sunday, April 02, 2006 - 11:10 am:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Alexei, there is nothing in Catholic doctrine that prevents the sale or closure of a church building.

Yes, the altars of churches have relics in them, and that's why the altars and everything else possible are removed when a church is closed.
Top of pageBottom of page

Southwestmap
Member
Username: Southwestmap

Post Number: 442
Registered: 01-2005
Posted From: 64.79.90.206
Posted on Monday, April 03, 2006 - 11:42 am:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Kova: are you in church on Sunday? If you were you would surely be aware that the AoD has a serious and scholarly anti-sprawl program. See this from an article discussing that program in America Magazine in 2002:

"We are getting a much better response from people as they become part of a public discourse,” said Ann Serra, who remembers the hopelessness she witnessed during the first meetings of the new anti-sprawl ministry. In the suburban parishes she heard horrible stories about Coleman Young (the former black mayor of Detroit) and his policies, as well as people’s fears about the migration and decline in the area. Now Ms. Serra conducts a dialogue with participants. She begins by first asking them why they chose the community they live in. Invariably they say, because of the schools, safety and lower taxes. No one has listed accessibility to shopping or highways. “What we are trying to do [through the sprawl issue] is build solidarity in the church,” she said. “Everyone is learning as we dialogue. The people see that we’re all Catholics, regardless of race, and that we have obligations to one another, whether we live in the city or the suburbs.”

The archdiocese has been contacting all its 314 parishes to join in this ministry against sprawl and to promote a regional mass transit system in southeastern Michigan. It has also teamed up with a local community organizing group called Moses (Metropolitan Organizing Strategy Enabling Strength), which works with other religious congregations in the city and suburbs on this issue. Moses provides a training program that teaches citizens how to take responsibility and mobilize for change in a democratic way. Residents learn how to build citizen coalitions from a position of power and action.

“To be powerful is a good thing,” said Bill O’Brien, executive director of Moses. “To be powerless is a scandal. Power is the ability to act. Through power we teach church leaders how to organize people and/or money.” O’Brien said that people become empowered because they are in relationship with individuals and groups of people. “The church is a place of relationship and community. We provide people with a strategy to make that happen.”
Top of pageBottom of page

Mbr
Member
Username: Mbr

Post Number: 55
Registered: 03-2005
Posted From: 152.160.42.163
Posted on Monday, April 03, 2006 - 12:54 pm:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Interesting article about the AoD being anti-sprawl:

http://www.mlui.org/transporta tion/fullarticle.asp?fileid=11 893
Top of pageBottom of page

Danny
Member
Username: Danny

Post Number: 3905
Registered: 02-2004
Posted From: 141.217.174.219
Posted on Monday, April 03, 2006 - 1:53 pm:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Well at least a UNITED CHURCH is more better than a divided church. I say go for it Cardinal Maida go the good Lord's work.

(Message edited by danny on April 03, 2006)
Top of pageBottom of page

Eastsidedog
Member
Username: Eastsidedog

Post Number: 144
Registered: 03-2006
Posted From: 69.220.142.7
Posted on Monday, April 03, 2006 - 2:09 pm:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Alexei289, I mostly agree. Nothing's sacred anymore. Convenience, efficiency and disposability override everything. Thank consumerism for that.

Some of these churches might become non-Catholic but truthfully, most of these buildings are so grand and expensive to operate and maintain that it is doubtful they will be reused. St. Charles by my house has been performing mass in the basement all winter because they can't afford to heat it.
Top of pageBottom of page

Susanarosa
Member
Username: Susanarosa

Post Number: 774
Registered: 11-2003
Posted From: 208.39.170.77
Posted on Monday, April 03, 2006 - 2:13 pm:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

I think ya'll are missing a piece of this puzzle.

A lot of churches are closing because of the lack of Catholics left in some neighborhoods, but that is compounded by the priest shortage.
Top of pageBottom of page

Kova
Member
Username: Kova

Post Number: 206
Registered: 12-2003
Posted From: 141.213.184.173
Posted on Monday, April 03, 2006 - 2:36 pm:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

I never said the AoD was pro sprawl. I said it was ineffective. And yes I'm well aware of MOSES I attended one of their mass meetings in 2001 I believe. Bill O'brien came over to our house and I even went to school with his kid. Where is moses now? I dont know, i didn’t really get too involved, but Google MOSES and you will find that most of the articles only go to about 2002. The AoD is a day late and many dollars short to get into the game now. It's a "start" though.


(Message edited by KOVA on April 03, 2006)
Top of pageBottom of page

Southwestmap
Member
Username: Southwestmap

Post Number: 445
Registered: 01-2005
Posted From: 64.79.90.206
Posted on Monday, April 03, 2006 - 2:47 pm:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Kova: you are right that MOSES isn't in the news in the way it was previously. I, for one, couldn't stand them - they came barging in to every initiative and took over and took all the public credit for other people's long-time work (such as the work of the Southwest Detroit Environmental Initiative, long and successfully championed by Kathy Milberg).

However, MOSES is still active. See this article from their website on Moses on immigration:

"For the Civil Rights of Immigrants local campaign, MOSES leaders are currently working with State Representative Steve Tobocman to create a model in-state tuition policy for undocumented students. MOSES has two delegates on Rep. Tobocman’s working group. Currently, undocumented students pay four times more the cost to attend a public university than documented students. We will take the model policy to our area universities and ask for it to be adopted. For the state-wide campaign, MOSES gained the support of Representative Tobocman to introduce legislation by April 30th on Workers Compensation for Michigan. Undocumented workers who are injured on the job are not eligible for workers compensation. MOSES CRI Taskforce will take a large delegation to Lansing to witness the event. On a national scale, MOSES is working with Gamaliel’s CRI Department to advance comprehensive immigration reform (CIR). We support the federal DREAM Act, which will allow undocumented students the opportunity to attend a university and we will begin a congressional visit campaign in the spring."
Top of pageBottom of page

Eastsidedog
Member
Username: Eastsidedog

Post Number: 148
Registered: 03-2006
Posted From: 69.220.142.7
Posted on Monday, April 03, 2006 - 2:55 pm:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Susanarosa is right. The congregations are shrinking year after year. The folks moving into the city generally aren't Catholics or practicing Catholics. What's AofD supposed to do?

I think they should at least just stop building new churches. But then they'll lose Catholics, and they need the money. The churches way out in exurbia donate lots of money per household, and to their credit many have sister churches in the inner city that they work with.
Top of pageBottom of page

Royaloakian
Member
Username: Royaloakian

Post Number: 66
Registered: 05-2004
Posted From: 65.42.23.2
Posted on Monday, April 03, 2006 - 3:47 pm:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Re the AOD anti sprawl, that info is out of date you should know Salt and Light for all practicle purposes does not exist anymore. Ms. Serra no longer works for the AOD and Dan Piepszowski is a now with New Detroit. The whole Christian Service Department was absorbed into other departments within the AOD two or three years ago. Personally I really wonder how anti sprawl they are given the close ties with the cardinal and Pulte.
Top of pageBottom of page

Southwestmap
Member
Username: Southwestmap

Post Number: 446
Registered: 01-2005
Posted From: 64.79.90.206
Posted on Monday, April 03, 2006 - 4:26 pm:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

The changes certainly happened - when the stock market went south they had to let a lot of people go. The rock star Jack White's mother (who worked for the Cardinal) was one such.

I believe, though, that the anti-sprawl mission continues through the Michigan Catholic Conference.
Top of pageBottom of page

Royaloakian
Member
Username: Royaloakian

Post Number: 67
Registered: 05-2004
Posted From: 65.42.23.2
Posted on Monday, April 03, 2006 - 4:35 pm:   Edit PostDelete Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

It may be with the MCC but I have not noticed anything of late as to how it pertains to the AOD. My friend who worked there told me Jack White's mother retired she wasn't let go as the Christian Service people were.

Add Your Message Here
Posting is currently disabled in this topic. Contact your discussion moderator for more information.