Discuss Detroit Archives - Beginning January 2006 Alternatives for Tiger Stadium Previous Next
Top of pageBottom of page

Douglasm
Member
Username: Douglasm

Post Number: 569
Registered: 10-2003
Posted From: 66.189.188.28
Posted on Thursday, June 15, 2006 - 5:25 pm: Edit PostDelete PostMove Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

I notice there's another "They're tearing down the old ball yard--wail, wail" thread running. We went through something like this up here in the northleft corner when The Kingdome was built with the obligatory "What do we do with Sick's Seattle Stadium, a piece of our history--wail, wail" period.

The problem up here was no one could find a decent use for a run down, outmoded 35,000 seat stadium. Is there or has there ever been a REALISTIC, PRACTICAL and RESONABLY SELF SUPPORTING plan for the preservation of Tiger Stadium, or do the basic plan of attack by preservation proponents consist of letting the stadium sit there and rot?
Top of pageBottom of page

Naturalsister
Member
Username: Naturalsister

Post Number: 733
Registered: 11-2004
Posted From: 68.255.240.120
Posted on Thursday, June 15, 2006 - 5:45 pm: Edit PostDelete PostMove Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

<<<<<<<<<<<<< Wants to know...

Do new threads that could have been posts on any number of PREVIOUS threads result in seismic organsms?

later - naturalsister
Top of pageBottom of page

Ray1936
Member
Username: Ray1936

Post Number: 625
Registered: 01-2005
Posted From: 207.200.116.139
Posted on Thursday, June 15, 2006 - 6:01 pm: Edit PostDelete PostMove Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Don't bother me none.
Top of pageBottom of page

Douglasm
Member
Username: Douglasm

Post Number: 570
Registered: 10-2003
Posted From: 66.189.188.28
Posted on Thursday, June 15, 2006 - 7:13 pm: Edit PostDelete PostMove Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Don't know. I asked for something I hadn't seen on the other Tiger Stadium threads. Realistic, Practical and Resonably Self Supporting.
Top of pageBottom of page

Supersport
Member
Username: Supersport

Post Number: 10185
Registered: 10-2003
Posted From: 24.12.55.203
Posted on Thursday, June 15, 2006 - 9:37 pm: Edit PostDelete PostMove Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Douglasm,

I personally like the plan that will happen over ANY planned reuse of the stadium.
Top of pageBottom of page

Billpdx
Member
Username: Billpdx

Post Number: 10
Registered: 05-2006
Posted From: 71.34.99.141
Posted on Thursday, June 15, 2006 - 11:28 pm: Edit PostDelete PostMove Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

I prefer an abandoned stadium to yet ANOTHER vacant lot.
Top of pageBottom of page

Jimelnino
Member
Username: Jimelnino

Post Number: 479
Registered: 06-2005
Posted From: 68.61.118.126
Posted on Friday, June 16, 2006 - 12:17 am: Edit PostDelete PostMove Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

I'd just like to point out that Tiger Stadium has a capacity of over 52,000

carry on... :-)

Add Your Message Here
Posting is currently disabled in this topic. Contact your discussion moderator for more information.