Bulletmagnet Member Username: Bulletmagnet
Post Number: 643 Registered: 01-2007
| Posted on Friday, June 15, 2007 - 8:46 pm: | |
I just finished re-reading the various threads about our local freeways. One question I am curious about has to do with the construction of I-94: Why does the road rise up from the 'ditch' level, to 'ground' level as you travel along the length of the Chandler Golf Course? Some one once told me it was because there was granite underneath that section, but I think it had more to do with need and cost. I know that the Southfield has many spots like this, but the Ford has just this one until you get west of Dearborn, or east of I-696. Any ideas? |
Bibs Member Username: Bibs
Post Number: 695 Registered: 10-2003
| Posted on Friday, June 15, 2007 - 10:37 pm: | |
What is under the freeway at that point? A bunch of folks on this site love to look at old maps to find rivers a streams which have directed under the city. Maybe, a creek runs under the freeway at that point! Just a guess. |
321brian Member Username: 321brian
Post Number: 373 Registered: 02-2006
| Posted on Friday, June 15, 2007 - 10:44 pm: | |
I think I remember reading the the Free Press 300 year anniversary book that there is a creek running under there. |
Gistok Member Username: Gistok
Post Number: 4547 Registered: 08-2004
| Posted on Friday, June 15, 2007 - 11:27 pm: | |
I think it's nothing more than simple economics. What was the point of digging deep when there will be no bridges crossing that nearly half mile section of I-94. Ditto for the many spots along the Southfield Fwy (although that seems more like a roller coaster ride). |
Fareastsider Member Username: Fareastsider
Post Number: 433 Registered: 08-2006
| Posted on Friday, June 15, 2007 - 11:59 pm: | |
Nope Conners Creek is under there. |
Jjaba Member Username: Jjaba
Post Number: 5357 Registered: 11-2003
| Posted on Saturday, June 16, 2007 - 12:03 am: | |
Gistok is correct about Southfield Freeway. It was already a large surface blvd. so they simply had to dig out the major mile rd. intersections to get it ready for a real expressway. The blvd. median was extracted and resurfaced as an expressway. jjaba has never been on I-94 East but would think that with no cross streets, it was cheaper to build it as surface roadway. jjaba on the westside. |
Gistok Member Username: Gistok
Post Number: 4548 Registered: 08-2004
| Posted on Saturday, June 16, 2007 - 12:12 am: | |
Fareastsider, I don't disagree with you, but it was probably a combination of factors. After all several rivers, such as the Milk River on I-94 just north of 8 Mile, also cross freeways. In those instances they have pumping facilities along either side of the freeways to handle the below grade water flow. Maybe at Chandler Park they took the easy way out, by bringing the freeway up to street grade, since no freeway bridges were needed in that area. |
Kellyroad Member Username: Kellyroad
Post Number: 86 Registered: 04-2007
| Posted on Saturday, June 16, 2007 - 1:20 am: | |
Gistok, I agree with you. Why dig when you don't need to. Also the aesthetics of traveling next to a golf course sure beats traveling along in a ditch. |
Gistok Member Username: Gistok
Post Number: 4549 Registered: 08-2004
| Posted on Saturday, June 16, 2007 - 1:44 am: | |
This whole discussion does bring up an interesting topic that I don't ever remember reading about on this forum... What was the affect to the Detroit sewer system when the freeways were first built? And how were they rerouted? |
Bulletmagnet Member Username: Bulletmagnet
Post Number: 645 Registered: 01-2007
| Posted on Saturday, June 16, 2007 - 7:40 am: | |
Good question about the sewers, Gistok.It would seem that a dig that deep would be a challenge for the engineers. One can see some bridges that carry water mains, and there some visible concrete bunkers along any freeway stretch. I would presume these 'bunkers' handle the sewerage, and other infrastructure gear. I think you answered the original question here correctly as economics more then anything. But still I wonder... |
Kville Member Username: Kville
Post Number: 61 Registered: 04-2007
| Posted on Saturday, June 16, 2007 - 8:20 am: | |
I read in The Detroit Almanac (page 148) that Fareastsider is correct. Conner Creek runs under there. And as Gistok pointed out, because of the park, there's no need to dig it out. |
Bulletmagnet Member Username: Bulletmagnet
Post Number: 649 Registered: 01-2007
| Posted on Saturday, June 16, 2007 - 8:47 am: | |
Well well well! So there IS something under there. Maps, any one? Thanks Kville. And you too Fareastsider. |
Fareastsider Member Username: Fareastsider
Post Number: 436 Registered: 08-2006
| Posted on Saturday, June 16, 2007 - 1:06 pm: | |
Do a search on the Milk River or it may be in the HOF. I know there is a 1910 map of Conner Creek courtesy of Mikem in the HOF I dont know how to link it though. Which reminds me I know it was posted before....how do you make links out of words on the board...a shortened link? |
Mikem Member Username: Mikem
Post Number: 3365 Registered: 10-2003
| Posted on Saturday, June 16, 2007 - 1:31 pm: | |
The Ford used to end at Conner (actually Norwood) before it was extended to Macomb County. When it was extended, there was no need to ditch it since there was only a park on one side, and a business strip on the other. It dives down again when is reaches a residential area. Conner Creek does not flow under it at that point. The creek's enclosure runs between Conner on the east and the railroad tracks paralleling Conner to the west. The main interceptor sewers were already below grade by 25'-50' along the path of the expressway. |
Jimaz Member Username: Jimaz
Post Number: 2312 Registered: 12-2005
| Posted on Saturday, June 16, 2007 - 3:19 pm: | |
Fareastsider, try this: \newurl{https://www.atdetroit.net/forum/mes sages/89914/90917.html,Active Archive: Milk River?} That should produce this: Active Archive: Milk River? |
Gistok Member Username: Gistok
Post Number: 4565 Registered: 08-2004
| Posted on Sunday, June 17, 2007 - 8:33 pm: | |
Thanks Jimaz! My bad, it wasn't the Milk River that crossed I-94, but the Girard Drain, which empties into the Milk River. |
Bulletmagnet Member Username: Bulletmagnet
Post Number: 672 Registered: 01-2007
| Posted on Monday, June 18, 2007 - 1:28 pm: | |
So we all agree that the only thing under this portion of 94 is dirt? No river, or Nike missiles or Hoffa? |
Civilprotectionunit4346 Member Username: Civilprotectionunit4346
Post Number: 4 Registered: 06-2007
| Posted on Wednesday, June 20, 2007 - 1:44 pm: | |
I live up in Chesterfield...the construction on 94 has been annoying. Hopefully they will be done by August or late august/early sept. Bulletmagnet..speaking of Nike Bases, there used to be one at Selfridge and one in Algonac. |
Dtwflyer Member Username: Dtwflyer
Post Number: 61 Registered: 01-2005
| Posted on Wednesday, June 20, 2007 - 4:51 pm: | |
Those concrete bunkers you see are the stormwater pumping stations used to pump out the water that collects in the low spots under bridges in depressed highways. If there is a power failure during a heavy rain/t-storm, or the pumps fail, then its possible for several feet of water to collect in these low points. Thats when you hear about the highway flooding and then the TV news crews run out there to fill footage of idiots flooding out their cars. As said, the sewer mains/intercepters are well underground. The collector lines underneath neighborhood streets are usually at least 7-10 feet underground. The mains that go underneath an expressway would be as said at least 20' or more, far enough the depressed road bed in most instances. |
Mikeg Member Username: Mikeg
Post Number: 943 Registered: 12-2005
| Posted on Wednesday, June 20, 2007 - 8:14 pm: | |
quote:If there is a power failure during a heavy rain/t-storm, or the pumps fail, then its possible for several feet of water to collect in these low points. A lot of times, the scrappers are the cause of these failures. They steal the copper wiring and the theft is not discovered until the next rainfall. |